Debunking Evolution

Evolution: the subject that has been long debated. First and foremost it is important to keep in mind that is STILL just a theory and a speculative theory at that. Darwin himself knew this and acknowledged it. He just hoped that time would vindicate him. David Rop, Curator of the Museum of Natural History in Chicago wrote:

“We are now over 120 years since Darwin and the knowledge on the fossil record has been greatly expanded. We now have a quarter of a million fossil species but the situation hasn’t changed much. We have fewer examples of evolutionary transition than we did in Darwin’s time”

Molecular biologist Michael John Denton (born 25 August 1943) is a British-Australian author and biochemist is wrote a book entitled Evolution: A Theory in Crisis. He says,

"There can be no question that Darwin had nothing like sufficient evidence to establish his theory of evolution […] His general theory, that all life on earth had originated and evolved by a gradual successive accumulation of fortuitous mutations, is still, as it was in Darwin’s time, a highly speculative hypothesis entirely without direct factual support and very far from that self-evident axiom some of its more aggressive advocates would have us believe. One might have expected that a theory of such cardinal importance, a theory that literally changed the world, would have been something more than metaphysics, something more than a myth.” (pages 69, 77, 358)

Although most (aggressive) atheists and non-believers will stop you at “evolution is NOT a theory”, let me remind you in the words of Dr. Denton:

“Darwin’s model of evolution […] being basically a theory of historical reconstruction, is impossible to verify by experiment or direct observation as is normal in science. Moreover, the theory of evolution deals with a series of unique events, the origin of life, the origin of intelligence and so on. Unique events are unrepeatable and cannot be subjected to any sort of experimental investigation.” (page 75)

“The overriding supremacy of the myth has created a widespread illusion that the theory of evolution was all but proved one hundred years ago… Nothing could be further from the truth.” (page 77)

"Molecular biology has shown that even the simplest of all living systems on earth today, bacterial cells, are exceedingly complex objects. Although the tiniest bacterial cells are incredibly small, weighing less than 10−12gms, each is in effect a veritable micro-miniaturized factory containing thousands of exquisitely designed pieces of intricate molecular machinery, made up altogether of one hundred thousand million atoms, far more complicated than any machine built by man and absolutely without parallel in the nonliving world. Molecular biology has also shown that the basic design of the cell system is essentially the same in all-living systems on earth from bacteria to mammals. In all organisms the roles of DNA, mRNA and protein are identical. The meaning of the genetic code is also virtually identical in all cells. The size, structure and component design of the protein synthetic machinery is practically the same in all cells. In terms of their basic biochemical design, therefore no living system can be thought of as being primitive or ancestral with respect to any other system, nor is there the slightest empirical hint of an evolutionary sequence among all the incredibly diverse cells on earth.” (page 250)

Homology is the similarity of structures between different types of organisms. Some have argued that these similarities are evidence of one common ancestor. However, when the concentration of red blood cells is used, utilizing the ideas of homology, man is more closely related to frogs, fish, and birds than to sheep. But now, with the development of molecular biology we are able to make a comparison of the same cells in different species, which adds a whole new dimension to homology. Unfortunately, for the evolutionists, molecular biology does as all other evidences do: presents greater argument against evolution theory.

In molecular biology, proteins of the same type in different organisms can be tested for difference in amino acid makeup. The figure resulting is converted into a percentage. The lower the percentage, the less difference there is between the proteins. Dr. Michael Denton, in experiments with Cytochrome C, a protein that converts food into energy, and hemoglobin, found the following. 

Cytochrome C Differences               Cytochrome C Differences

Bacterium to Six Organisms               Silkmoth to Vertebrates

to yeast . . . . . . . 69%                          to lamprey . . . . .27%

to wheat . . . . . . . 66%                         to carp. . . . . . .25%

to silkmoth. . . . . . 65%                        to pigeon. . . . . .26%

to tuna. . . . . . . . 65%                          to turtle. . . . . .25%

to pigeon. . . . . . . 64%                        to horse . . . . . .30%

to horse . . . . . . . 64%

Cytochrome C Differences          Hemoglobin Differences

Carp to Terrestrial Vertebrates      Lamprey to Other Vertebrates

to bullfrog. . . . . . 13%                     to human . . . . . .73%

to turtle. . . . . . . 13%                       to kangaroo. . . . .76%

to chicken . . . . . . 14%                   to chicken . . . . .78%

to rabbit. . . . . . . 13%                      to frog. . . . . . .76%

to horse . . . . . . . 13%                     to carp. . . . . . .75%

Dr. Denton states, "There is not a trace at a molecular level of the traditional evolutionary series: fish to amphibian to reptile to mammal. Incredibly man is closer to lamprey than are fish." The evidence is clear; evolution is struck another hard blow! 

See this post on Instagram